Role of chemical plant protection products in worldwide food security (literature review)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The contribution of pesticides to food security from the 1960s and up to 2100, when the Earth’s population, according to United Nations forecasts, will reach a sustainable value of 10.2 billion people, is considered. There are presented international estimates of the effectiveness of pesticides for crop preservation, the economic feasibility of their use. Side effects of pesticide use, such as the development of resistance and non-target drift, are discussed. A brief description of the system developed in the Soviet Union for substantiating hygienic standards for maximum permissible levels of pesticide residues in food products of plant origin, carried out in accordance with the principle of integrated hygienic standardization, which consists in the fact that the possible intake of a drug into the human body with food products, water, and atmospheric air should not exceed the permissible daily dose for an average-sized person is provided. This approach, applied today in the post-Soviet space, is unique in world practice, since in other member countries of the World Health Organization, when establishing maximum permissible levels (MPLs), the potential intake of the active substance from the environment (water, air) is not taken into account. It is concluded that the use of chemical plant protection products will remain the basis for ensuring food security in the foreseeable future since it is not only cost-effective, but also necessary in the context of population growth and the impossibility of proportionally increasing the area of agricultural land.

The material for this review was mainly data from foreign literature because such analyses have not been published in the domestic press before. One of the reasons for this is the methodological complexity in collecting and evaluating the necessary data for the Russian Federation. When searching for information, the SpringerLink, Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, RINTS and CyberLeninka databases were used.

Contribution:
Masaltsev G.V. – concept and design of the study, collection and analysis of literary data, writing the text;
Veshchemova T.E.
– concept and design of the study, collection and analysis of literary data, writing the text;
Rakitskii V.N., Kuzmin S.V. – concept and design of the study.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement.The study was carried out within the framework tof the industry programs of Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) “Scientific justification of the national system for ensuring sanitary and epidemiological well-being, health risk management and improving the quality of life of the population of Russia” (2021–2025).

Received: November 1, 2024 / Revised: November 27, 2024 / Accepted: Decembeer 3, 2024 / Published: December 28, 2024

About the authors

Gleb V. Masaltsev

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: masalcev.gv@fncg.ru

PhD (Biology), Head of the Toxicology Department, Institute of Hygiene, Pesticide Toxicology and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: masalcev.gv@fncg.ru

Tatiana E. Veshchemova

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: veshchemova.te@fncg.ru

PhD (Medicine), Senior researcher, Occupational Health Department, Institute of Hygiene, Pesticide Toxicology and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: veshchemova.te@fncg.ru

Valerii N. Rakitskii

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: rakitskii.vn@fncg.ru

DSc (Medicine), Academician of the RAS, Professor, Scientific Director of the Institute of Hygiene, Pesticide Toxicology and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: rakitskii.vn@fncg.ru

Sergey V. Kuz’min

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Author for correspondence.
Email: fncg@fncg.ru

DSc (Medicine), Professor, Director of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: fncg@fncg.ru

References

  1. WHO. World Population Prospects 2024 Summary of Results July 2024; 2024. Available at: https://un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/key_messages_wpp_2024_20240709.pdf
  2. Grainger M. World Summit on Food Security (UN FAO, Rome, 16–18 November 2009). Development in Practice. 2010; 20(6): 740–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2010.491540
  3. Oerke E.C., Dehne H.W. Safeguarding production – losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop. Prot. 2024; 23(4): 275–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.001
  4. Oerke E.C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agr. Sci. 2006; 144(1): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708 https://elibrary.ru/hwbeaf
  5. IWMI. Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan and Colombo. London: International Water Management Institute; 2007.
  6. Oerke E.C., Dehne H.W., Schonbeck F., Weber A. Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1994.
  7. Popp J. Cost-benefit analysis of crop protection measures. J. Consum. Prot. Food S. 2011; (6): 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-011-0677-4
  8. CABI’s Crop Protection Compendium. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International (CABI); 2005. Available at: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/product/qc
  9. Popp J., Pető K., Nagy J. Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013; 33(1): 243–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x
  10. USDA. Commodity costs and returns: U.S. and regional cost and return data; 2010. Available at: http://ers.usda.gov./data/costsandreturns
  11. Brookes G., Barfoot P. GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2008. PG Economics Ltd, UK; 2010.
  12. McDougall P. AgriService, Industry Overview – 2009 Market, Vineyard Business Centre Saughland Pathhead Midlothian EH37 5XP Copyright; 2010.
  13. FAOSTAT. Pesticide Use; 2022. Available at: https://fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RP
  14. Gianessi L.P., Reigner N. The value of fungicides in U.S. crop production. Croplife Foundation, Crop Protection Research Institute (CPRI); 2005.
  15. Gianessi L.P., Reigner N. The value of herbicides in U.S. crop production. 2005 Update. Croplife Foundation, Crop Protection Research Institute (CPRI); 2006.
  16. Gianessi L.P. The value of insecticides in U.S. crop production. Croplife Foundation, Crop Protection Research Institute (CPRI); 2009.
  17. Bennett B., Cooper J., Dobson H. We know where the shoe pinches: a case study-based analysis of the social benefits of pesticides. Outlook Agric. 2010; 39(2): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000010791745420
  18. Van den Bosch R. The Pesticide Conspiracy. Berkeley, California: UC Press; 2023.
  19. Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. BioScience. 1992; 42: 750–60.
  20. Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States. Environ. Dev. Sus. 2005; 7: 229–52.
  21. Pimentel D., Greiner A. Environmental and socio-economic costs of pesticide use, chapter 4. In: Pimentel D., ed. Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use: Economic and Environmental Benefits. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1997.
  22. Pimentel D. Benefits and costs of pesticide use in US food production. BioScience. 1978; 28(772): 778–84.
  23. Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2001-X Draft: Spray and Dust Drift Label Statement for Pesticide Products. US EPA; 2001.
  24. Al Heidary M.H., Douzals J.P., Sinfort C., Vallet A. Influence of spray characteristics on potential spray drift of field crop sprayers: a literature review. Crop. Prot. 2014; 63(9): 120–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.05.006
  25. Hilz E., Vermeer A.W.P. Spray drift review: the extent to which a formulation can contribute to spray drift. Crop. Prot. 2013; 44: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.020
  26. Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products. EFSA Journal. 2022; 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032
  27. Ellis M.C.B., Harris D., Lane A.G., Tuck C.R. Novel spray adjuvants to decrease spray drift. Asp. Appl. Biol. 2016; (132): 257–63.
  28. Ellis M.C.B., Lane A.G., O’Sullivan C.M., Alanis R., Harris A., Stallinga H., et al. Bystander and resident exposure to spray drift from orchard applications: field measurements, including a comparison of spray drift collectors. Asp. Appl. Biol. 2014; (122): 187–94.
  29. Fritz B.K. Meteorological effects on deposition and drift of aerially applied sprays. Trans. ASABE. 2006; 49(5): 1295–1301. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22038
  30. Fritz B.K., Hoffmann C., Bagley W.E. Effects of spray mixtures on droplet size under aerial application conditions and implications on drift. Appl. Eng. Agricul. 2010; 26(1): 21–9. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29467
  31. Hall F.R., Fox R.D. The reduction of pesticide drift. In: Foy C.L., Pritchard D.W., eds. Pesticide Formulation and Adjuvant Technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997: 209–40.
  32. Ozkan E., ed. Equipment Developments. Chemical Application Technology, Newsletter; 1997. Available at: http://ag.ohio-state.edu/catnews/catequi.htm
  33. Rakitskii V.N., Chkhvirkiya E.G. On the issue of hygienic rationing of pesticides in food products. In: Health and the Environment: A Collection of Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference [Zdorov’e i okruzhayushchaya sreda: Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii]. Minsk; 2023: 438–40. https://elibrary.ru/ksltdu (in Russian)
  34. Rakitskii V.N., Tereshkova L.P., Chkhvirkiya E.G., Epishina T.M. Fundamentals of ensuring the safe application of pesticides. Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2020; 64(1): 45–50. https://doi.org/10.18821/0044-197X-2020-64-1-45-50 https://elibrary.ru/uqbpis (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.