Preparation of the Abstracts for Publication in the Proceedings of the Conferences



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

About the authors

V L BYKOV

V L BYKOV

References

  1. Быков В.Л. Реферат научной статьи - ненужное приложение или ценный источник информации? Морфология, 2003, вып. 1, с. 7-8.
  2. Alexandrov A.V. and Hennerici M.G. Writing good abstracts. Cerebrovasc. Dis., 2007, v. 23, № 4, p. 256-259.
  3. Autorino R., Quarto G., Di Lorenzo G. et al. What happens to the abstracts presented at the SocieM Internationale d'Urologie meeting? Urology, 2008, v. 71, № 3, p. 367-371.
  4. Barnes D.M. Still struggling to define scientific misconduct. J. NIH Res., 1992, v. 4, № 1, p. 10.
  5. Broad W.J. The publishing game: getting more for less. Science, 1981, v. 211, p. 1137-1139.
  6. Callaham M.L., Wears R.L., Weber E.J. et al. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA, 1998, v. 280, № 3, p. 254-257.
  7. Dahllof G., Wondimu B. and Maniere M.C. Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent., 2008, v.18, № 2, p. 91-97.
  8. Dickersin K. and Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci., 1993, v. 703, p. 135-146.
  9. Doherty M. The misconduct of redundant publication. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1996, v. 55, p. 783-785.
  10. Easterbrook P.J., Berlin J.A., Gopalan R. and Matthews D.R. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet, 1991, v. 337, p. 867-872.
  11. Kelly J.A. Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 1998, v. 86, № 1, p. 68-76.
  12. Larian B., Namazie A., Agha N. et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 2001, v. 125, p. 166-169.
  13. Pierson D.J. How to write an abstract that will be accepted for presentation at a national meeting. Respir. Care, 2004 (а), v. 49, № 10, p. 1206 -1212.
  14. Pierson D.J. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respir. Care, 2004 (б), v. 49, № 10, p. 1246 -1252.
  15. Poolman R.W., Keijser L.C., de Waal Malefijt M.C. et al. Reviewer agreement in scoring 419 abstracts for scientific orthopedics meetings. Acta Orthop., 2007, v. 78, № 2, p. 278-284.
  16. Riordan F.A.I. Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? Arch. Dis. Child, 2000, v. 83, p. 524-526.
  17. Rosmarakis E.S., Soteriades E.S., Vergidis P.I. et al. From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals. FASEB J., 2005, v. 19, p. 673-680.
  18. Ross J.S., Gross C.P., Desai M.M. et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA, 2006, v. 295, № 14, p.1675-1680.
  19. Sanossian N., Ohanian A.G., Saver J.L. et al. Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature. Stroke, 2006, v. 37, p. 2588-2592.
  20. Scherer R.W., Dickersin K. and Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA, 1994, v. 272, № 2, p. 158-162.
  21. Susser M. and Yankauer A. Prior, duplicate, repetitive, fragmented, and redundant publication and editorial decisions. Am. J. Public Health, 1993, v. 83, № 6 , p. 792-793.
  22. Taboulet P. Advice on writing an abstract for a scientific meeting and on the evaluation of abstracts by selection committees. Eur J. Emerg. Med., 2000, v. 7, № 1, p. 67-72.
  23. von Elm E., Costanza M.C., Walder B. and Tramer M.R. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res. Methodol., 2003; v. 3, № 1, p. 12-22.
  24. Weber E.J., Callaham M.L., Wears R.L. et al. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting. Why investigators fail to publish. JAMA, 1998, v. 280, p. 257-259.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2009 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: № 0110212 от 08.02.1993.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies