THE VARIABILITY OF THE LEVEL OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ADOLESCENCE



如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Objective - to assess the level of morphological sexual dimorphism of the somatic characteristics and 2D:4D digit ratio. Materials and methods. The data of anthropometric study of the sample of young people of the Russian nationality from the Middle Volga region were analyzed. Standard anthropometric procedures, as well as statistical methods of regression and correlation analysis were used. Results. High level of morphological sexual dimorphism was demonstrated in the sample studied. The maximum degree of sexual dimorphism occurred in such traits as shoulder width, index of Tanner, waist-to-hip ratio, width of elbow, wrist and ankle, the strength of the hand and the musculoskeletal mass estimated by the method of bioimpedance analysis. In comparison with the general level of sexual dimorphism in morphological traits and their ratios, the level of sexual dimorphism in 2D:4D digit ratio appeared to be low. Conclusions. The assumption is made about the absence of adverse environmental and social impacts on the sample studied and the domination of the hormonal factors of puberty in the formation of morphological sexual dimorphism.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

V. Bakholdina

Moscow State University

Email: vbaholdina@mail.ru
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology 1 Lenin Hills, Moscow 119234

M. Negasheva

Moscow State University

Email: negasheva@mail.ru
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology 1 Lenin Hills, Moscow 119234

A. Movsesian

Moscow State University

Email: amovsessyan@gmail.com
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology 1 Lenin Hills, Moscow 119234

参考

  1. Година Е. З., Хомякова И. А., Задорожная Л. В., Пурунджан А. Л., Гилярова О. А. Московские дети: основные тенденции роста и развития на рубеже столетий. Часть 1 // Вопросы антропологии. 2003. № 91. С. 42-60.
  2. Година Е. З., Хомякова И. А., Пурунджан А. Л., Задорожная Л. В., Степанова А. В., Гилярова О. А. Московские дети: основные тенденции роста и развития на рубеже столетий. Часть 2 // Вопросы антропологии. 2005. № 92. С. 56-75.
  3. Зимина С. Н.,Гончарова Н. Н.,Саливон И. И.,Негашева М. А. Влияние биосоциальных факторов на уровень полового диморфизма в современных популяциях городского и сельского населения // Вестник МГУ. Серия 23: Антропология. 2015. № 2. С. 34-44.
  4. Синёва И. М., Негашева М. А., Попов Ю. М. Сравнительный анализ уровня физического развития студентов разных городов России // Вестник МГУ. Серия 23: Антропология. 2017. № 4. С. 17-27.
  5. Хрисанфова Е. Н. Антрополого-эндокринологические исследования как способ познания биосоциальной природы человека (историческая филогения) // Антропология на пороге III тысячелетия. Т. 1. М., 2003. С. 67-85.
  6. Bakholdina V. Yu., Movsesian A. A., Sineva I. M. Digit ratio (2D:4D): is it possible to use it for the sex determination in the study of human skeletal remains? // Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2016. Vol. 28, № 4. P. 591-593.
  7. Barut C., Tan U., Dogan A. Association of height and weight with second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences // Percept Mot Skills. 2008. Vol. 106, № 2. P. 627-632.
  8. Danborno B., Adebisi S. S., Adelaiye A. B., Ojo S. A. Sexual dimorphism and relationship between chest, hip and waist cir cum ference with 2D, 4D and 2D:4D in Nigerians // Internet J. Biol. Anthropol. 2008.
  9. Fink B., Neave N., Manning J. T. Second to fourth digit ratio, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-chest ratio: their relationships in heterosexual men and women // Ann. Hum. Biol. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 728-738.
  10. Gabory A., Attig L., Junien C. Sexual dimorphism in environmental epigenetic programming // Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2009. I. 304. P. 8-18.
  11. Hönekopp J., Watson S. Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand // Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2010. Vol. 22. P. 619-630.
  12. Koehler N., Simmons L. W., Rhodes G. How well does second-to-fourth-digit ratio in hands correlate with other indications of masculinity in males // Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2004. Vol. 271. Suppl. 5. P. 296-298.
  13. Kratochvíl L., Flegr J. Differences in the 2nd to 4th digit length ratio in humans reflect shifts along the common allometric line // Biol. Lett. 2009. Vol. 5. P. 643-646.
  14. Liana E., Hone L. S. E., McCullough M. E. 2D:4D ratios predict hand grip strength (but not hand grip endurance) in men (but not in women) // Evol. Hum. Behav. 2012. Vol. 33. P. 780-789.
  15. Lutchmaya S., Baron-Cohen S., Raggatt P., Knickmeyer R., Manning J. T. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol // Early Hum. Dev. 2004. Vol. 77. P. 23-28.
  16. Manning J. T., Barley L., Walton J., Lewis-Jones D. I., Trivers R.L, Singh D., Thornhill R., Rohde P., Bereczkei T., Henzi P., Soler M., Szwed A. The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimor phism, population differences, and reproductive success. Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? // Evol. Hum. Behav. 2000. Vol. 21 (3). P. 163-183.
  17. Manning J. T. Fluctuating asymmetry and bodyweight in men and women: implications for sexual selection // Ethnol. Sociobiol. 1995. Vol. 16. P. 145-152.
  18. Negasheva M., Godina E., Lapshina N. Sex and gender differences in tempos of ageing of Moscow population and their biosocial meaning: a pilot study // Collegium Antropologicum. 2016. Vol. 40, № 4. P. 223-230.
  19. Tanner J. M. Foetus into Man. Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1990. P. 288.
  20. Zhao D., Yu K., Zhang X., Zheng L. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and handgrip strength in Hani ethnicity // PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8 (10). P. e77958.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2018


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: № 0110212 от 08.02.1993.
##common.cookie##