Email this article THE PECULIARITIES OF UTERINE STRUCTURE AFTER DELIVERY IN RATS WITH THE MYOMETRIAL SCAR
- Authors: Maiborodin I.V.1, Pekarev O.G.1, Yakimova N.V.1, Pekareva Y.O.1, Maiborodina V.I.1, Perminova Y.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine
- Issue: Vol 147, No 2 (2015)
- Pages: 49-53
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://j-morphology.com/1026-3543/article/view/398860
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/morph.398860
- ID: 398860
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The uterine tissues of female rats (n=30) with a scarred myometrium were examined by methods of light microscopy after the delivery. 1.5-2 months after the delivery no significant differences in the parameters of blood and lymph flow in the deep layers of the endometrium, myometrium and the myometrial scar tissue were found between the intact rats, nulliparous rats with a scarred uterus, rats that gave birth after laparotomy only and those that gave birth under the conditions of myometrial scar. In the course of pregnancy and labor activity, the damage of the tissues was observed not in the uterine scar proper, but at its borders with the myometrium. This is supported by the old hemorrhages and lymphostasis phenomena, greater number of lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages and erythrocytes. In determining the indications and contraindications to vaginal childbirth in women with scarred uterus it is necessary to examine not only the scar proper, but also its border with the myometrium. The myometrial scar by itself, is not an absolute contraindication to vaginal delivery, the natural delivery is feasible in the absence of cavities with liquid and hemorrhages in the tissues of the uterine scar and at its border with myometrium.
Keywords
Full Text
About the authors
I. V. Maiborodin
RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineCenter of New Medical Technologies
O. G. Pekarev
RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineCenter of New Medical Technologies
N. V. Yakimova
RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineCenter of New Medical Technologies
Ye. O. Pekareva
RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineCenter of New Medical Technologies
V. I. Maiborodina
RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineCenter of New Medical Technologies
Ye. I. Perminova
RAS Siberian Branch Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineCenter of New Medical Technologies
References
- Лазаров Л., Стратиев С. Морфологична характеристика на цикатрикса при повторно цезарево сечение // Акуш. и гин. (София). 1993. Т. 32, № 2. С. 12-14.
- Майбородин И. В., Домников А. В., Ковалевский К. П. Количество тучных клеток как индикатор ангиогенеза в аутотрансплантированных тканях // Морфология. 2003. Т. 124, вып. 6. С. 66-70.
- Шехтер А. Б., Милованова З. П. Фибробласт-фиброкласт: Ультраструктурные механизмы резорбции коллагеновых волокон при инволюции соединительной ткани // Арх. пат. 1975. Т. 37, № 3. С. 13-19.
- Якутина М. Ф. Сосуды и нервы шва матки после кесарева сечения (клинико-экспериментальное исследование // Вопр. охр. мат. 1968. Т. 13, № 6. С. 50-57.
- Ben A. N., Sadfi A., Gara F. Advantages and risk of a trial of vaginal delivery in the scarred uterus // Tunis Med. 2003. Vol. 81, № 8. P. 563-566.
- Diab A. E. Uterine ruptures in Yemen // Saudi Med. J. 2005. Vol. 26, № 2. P. 264-269.
- Ezechi O. C., Mabayoje P., Obiesie L. O. Ruptured uterus in South Western Nigeria: a reappraisal // Singapore Med. J. 2004. Vol. 45, № 3. P. 113-116.
- Hassan A. Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section // J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad. 2005. Vol. 17, № 1. P. 57-61.
- Head J. R., Seeling L. L. Jr. Lymphatic vessels in the uterine endometrium of virgin rats // J. Reprod. Immunol. 1984. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 157-166.
- Kiss D., Gyorik J., Rajkovits K. Histological examination of uterus healing following cesarean section // Zbl. Gynäkol. 1978. Vol. 100, № 5. P. 309-312.
- Klemm P., Koehler C., Mangler M. et al. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound // J. Perinat. Med. 2005. Vol. 33, № 4. P. 324-331.
- Ofir K., Sheiner E., Levy A. et al. Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004. Vol. 191, № 2. P. 425-429.
- Scioscia M., Pontrelli G., Vimercati A. et al. A short-scheme protocol of gemeprost for midtrimester termination of pregnancy with uterine scar // Contraception. 2005. Vol. 71, № 3. P. 193- 196.
- Singhal S. R., Agarwal U., Sangwan K. et al. Intrapartum posterior uterine wall rupture in lower segment cesarean section scarred uterus // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2005. Vol. 84, № 2. P. 196-197.
- Uzoigwe S. A., Fiebai P. O., MacPepple D. A. Spontaneous midtrimester uterine rupture: a case report // Niger J. Med. 2004. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 290-292.
- Yap O. W., Kim E. S., Laros R. K. Jr. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 184, № 7. P. 1576-1581.
Supplementary files
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).